Polymerase Chain Reaction - PCR
Reverse Transcriptase quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technique for detecting, quantifying and amplifying nucleic acids. The basic PCR mechanism involves the use of an enzyme called DNA polymerase to synthesize complementary strands of DNA from a denatured double-stranded template, effectively doubling the original sample with every cycle of the PCR reaction. This molecular copying operates through cycles of thermal reactions enabled by an assembly of biochemical reagents, and amplifies a few copies of DNA to millions. Amplified DNA can then be analyzed qualitatively (for its presence), quantitatively (by amount) or sequentially (for its genetic code), and used in downstream molecular biology applications.
Since its development by Kary Mullis in 1983, PCR has revolutionized the molecular biology field, giving rise to many advantageous techniques that allow the analysis of different nucleic acids.

It’s important to be familiar with the materials and reagents involved in PCR and understand how altering their concentration in the PCR reaction can lead to optimal target DNA amplification.
The PCR reaction may be enhanced through the use of additives. These may increase stringency or stabilize enzymatic activity resulting in increase PCR efficiency. Various additives along with their effects and recommended concentration are discussed in the following table.

Basic PCR can be split into three general stages: denaturation, annealing and extension. Typically, a PCR protocol consists of an initial denaturation step, around 30 cycles of these three stages, a final extension step, and a holding step with a temperature of 4-10°C. Shown below is one PCR cycle detailing the different stages and the corresponding temperatures.




The resulting amplicon can then be visualized through staining with dye or through labeling with fluorescent nucleotides or primers. In an electrophoresis reaction, agarose gels and visualizing molecules demonstrate the size and quantity of DNA product in comparison to DNA ladders (molecular weight size markers) with standard lengths and markers.
This visualization is conducted in reactions like gel electrophoresis, a standard procedure that separates DNA molecules via length and demonstrates their homogeneity. Electrical fields cause DNA to migrate through a gel matrix with differential speeds, and they can be tagged with other molecules for easy identification through color or fluorescence. Shorter fragments move at a more rapid pace, so approximate size can be calculated by the comparison between PCR fragments and DNA ladders to confirm consistency.
Various specialized PCR techniques have been developed to address researchers’ specific needs. The use of a specific type of PCR depends on the nucleic acid source, the desired amplicon and downstream application. These distinct techniques may involve a supplementary reaction to amplify target sequences from RNA. Others employ a different mechanism of analysis or amplicon visualization, such as when the product is quantified during the replication cycles. Here, we discuss popular variations on this method including reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), quantitative PCR (qPCR) and reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).
Reverse transcription PCR, or RT-PCR, is used to create an amplicon from a sample of RNA rather than DNA. In this technique, RNA is first reverse transcribed into double-stranded complementary DNA (cDNA), which is then amplified through PCR. As with basic PCR, the purity and integrity of the starting sample is critical in RT-PCR because successful amplification relies on proper reverse transcription of RNA into cDNA. Furthermore, the additional steps in RT-PCR increases the potential for contamination, degradation or mistakes to proliferate and must be considered
RT-PCR can be performed using a one-step or a two-step method. In one-step RT-PCR the reagents for the RT and PCR reaction are added to a single tube allowing both reactions to occur simultaneously. In two-step RT-PCR, the RT reaction occurs separately from the PCR reaction. One advantage of one step RT-PCR is the lower probability of contamination because the sample is less exposed to the environment in a single tube and the process requires less pipetting. Also, the results have higher reproducibility and the procedure takes less time. However, one-step RT-PCR only allows the use of sequence-specific primers. On the other hand, two-step RT-PCR allows the use of random primers or oligo(dTs) and the resulting cDNA sample can be stored for long periods of time and used for multiple PCRs. The cDNA template, dNTPs, polymerases and salts are transferred from the finished RT reaction to the amplifying reaction (see One-step and two-step RT-PCR Figure). This increases the chances for contamination (further discussed in the Troubleshooting section).

PCR is a very useful method for qualitative DNA analysis and for the amplification of less abundant DNA samples for sequencing, cloning, genotyping and other applications. In another PCR method, quantitative PCR (qPCR), also known as real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR), we can analyze the quantity (copy number) of target DNA as it is replicated, in real time. PCR amplification occurs in different phases that are evident in the resulting qPCR amplification curve (shown in green): the initiation phase, exponential growth phase and the plateau.

Quantification of the amplicon is possible due to the use of fluorescent emission from a dye or probe upon production of double stranded DNA. When amplification is just beginning, at the initiation phase, very low levels of fluorescence (baseline levels) from the initial reporter are detected because a very small amount of amplicon has been produced. The reaction is just beginning and any small levels of fluorescence generated are considered noise at this stage. A threshold value, the point at which fluorescence reaches values above baseline levels can be set manually or by the analysis software being used. In the following stage, the exponential growth phase, the subsequent successive cycles of amplification results in exponential increase of copies of the target DNA, leading to accumulation of fluorescence. During this stage the quantity of the product is directly proportional to amount of template and it's when quantification analysis is performed. In the third phase, the plateau, amplification is no longer occurring exponentially since reagents have been used and fluorescence levels do not increase. This method is routinely used to specifically quantify the amount of one target gene, fractions of DNA or other organic molecules within one sample.
qPCR uses a fluorescent reporter molecule – a fluorescent dye, labeled oligonucleotide primer or probe.


Quantification of a specific RNA target can be achieved by coupling reverse transcription (RT) with qPCR – reverse transcriptase real time quantitative PCR. This method requires the collection of RNA, then the reverse transcription to obtain cDNA followed by quantification with real-time quantitative PCR. The polymerase must be carefully chosen and primers must be designed for proper reverse transcription of target RNA. In addition, the resulting cDNA must correspond to the entire RNA template provided for accurate quantification. Other specialized protocols and kits are available for mRNA or microRNA RT-qPCR.
RT-qPCR can be performed in either one- or two-step procedures described previously. Thus, the summarized steps of RT-qPCR are
1. Generation of cDNA through reverse transcription.
2. Quantitative PCR and thermocycling.
3. Data output for analysis.
Hot start method of PCR is a technique that is often used to improve PCR efficiency by preventing nonspecific product formation. This technique involves excluding one or more reagents (such as the polymerase) until a specific temperature (60-80°C) is reached or reversibly inhibiting the polymerase. In the first method, as the reaction is assembled at specific temperature, the missing reagent is added after a specific temperature is reached. In another hot start method, when all the materials are combined, the temperature is increased to a heat index that will prompt polymerase activity, which was previously inactive due to its bonds to another molecule. Another approach involves chemically modifying the primers may be modified. Also other reagents might be retained in wax, so that heat is required to free them for use in the reaction.
Hot start prevents polymerases like Pfu or Taq from extending before a higher temperature is reached, thus decreasing the likelihood of nonspecific transcription at low temperatures. The method benefits small and large-quantity replication by stalling polymerase activation until covalent bonds are broken during denaturing. Hot start PCR will improve both multiplex and single-sided PCR reactions by suppressing these side reactions, primer oligomerization and mis-priming that reduce amplicon production. Less primer dimerization or nonspecific DNA annealing improves PCR product; starting when high heat is already achieved also prevents side products from being rapidly produced as they are at room temperature, as these can impede amplicon generation.
High fidelity PCR is useful when the downstream applications include cloning, mutagenesis and expression, which require minimal errors during the replication process. Pfu is a commonly used proofreading polymerase used in high fidelity PCR. This enzyme has 3′→5′ exonuclease activity and is used to reduce the number of replication errors. Pfu's exonuclease activity corrects mismatches between the template and the new DNA strand by cleaving the erroneous nucleotide and replacing it with the correct one. The error rate of Pfu is 10-fold lower than that of Taq polymerase, and it is capable of higher fidelity at high pH. In addition, Pfu can amplify up to 25 kb. Proofreading activity does slow down the process, but it allows the removal of an incorrect nucleotide.
Multiplex PCR is another common variant which uses differing pairs of primers for the same reaction in multiple iterations, a technique that amplifies different target sequences from within the same sample. In this method, optimization is of larger concern to effectively amplify the various targets, so hot-start method and optimizing buffers often coincide with multiplex techniques. The process requires labeled oligonucleotide primers or probes when employed for qPCR. Due to the complexity of the multiple-tiered transcription, materials for multiplex are often assembled in kits for specifically designed tests and can be purchased as such.
There are numerous other variations on PCR, including nested, long-range and single-cell, but they are less frequently used. Much of the protocol for the more common systems can be found on GoldBio’s website, and we list them below for easy access.

Alonso, A. (2004). Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies. Forensic Science International,139(2-3), 141-149. Doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.008.
Baranauskas, A., Paliksa, S., Alzbutas, G., Vaitkevicius, M., Lubiene, J., Letukiene, V., . . . Skirgaila, R. (2012). Generation and characterization of new highly thermostable and processive M-MuLV reverse transcriptase variants. Protein Engineering Design and Selection, 25(10), 657-668. Doi:10.1093/protein/gzs034.
Champoux, J. J., & Schultz, S. J. (2009). Ribonuclease H: Properties, substrate specificity and roles in retroviral reverse transcription. FEBS Journal, 276(6), 1506-1516. Doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06909.x.
Chou, Q., Russell, M., Birch, D. E., Raymond, J., & Bloch, W. (1992). Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications. Nucleic Acids Research, 20(7), 1717-1723. Doi:10.1093/nar/20.7.1717.
Clark, D. P., & Pazdernik, N. J. (2013). Molecular biology. Elsevier. Doi:10.1016/C2009-0-01986-2.
Das, S., & Dash, H. R. (2015). Microbial Biotechnology- A Laboratory Manual for Bacterial Systems. Doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2095-4.
Deoxynucleotide Triphosphates and Buffer Components. (2008). Principles and Technical Aspects of PCR Amplification, 91-101. Doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6241-4_6.
Determining Annealing Temperatures for Polymerase Chain Reaction. (2012). The American Biology Teacher, 74(4), 256-260. Doi:10.1525/abt.2012.74.4.9.
Dieffenbach, C. W., Lowe, T. M., & Dveksler, G. S. (1993). General concepts for PCR primer design. Genome Research, 3(3). Doi:10.1101/gr.3.3.s30
Doublié, S., Tabor, S., Long, A. M., Richardson, C. C., & Ellenberger, T. (1998). Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7 DNA replication complex at 2.2 Åresolution. Nature, 391(6664), 251-258. Doi:10.1038/34593.
Farrell, R. E. (2010). RNA methodologies: Laboratory guide for isolation and characterization. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.
Gallagher, S. R. (2001). Quantitation of DNA and RNA with Absorption and Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Immunology. Doi:10.1002/0471142735.ima03ls21.
Garibyan, L., & Avashia, N. (2013). Polymerase Chain Reaction. Journal of Investigative Dermatology,133(3), 1-4. Doi:10.1038/jid.2013.1
Ilic, S., Akabayov, S. R., Froimovici, R., Meiry, R., Vilenchik, D., Hernandez, A., . . . Akabayov, B. (2017). Modulation of RNA primer formation by Mn(II)-substituted T7 DNA primase. Scientific Reports, 7(1). Doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05534-3.
Juskowiak, B. (2010). Nucleic acid-based fluorescent probes and their analytical potential. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 399(9), 3157-3176. Doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4304-5.
Kramer, M. F., & Coen, D. M. (2001). Enzymatic Amplification of DNA by PCR: Standard Procedures and Optimization. Current Protocols in Toxicology. Doi:10.1002/0471140856.txa03cs03.
Lodish, H. F. (2000). Molecular cell biology (4th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Lorenz, T. C. (2012). Polymerase Chain Reaction: Basic Protocol Plus Troubleshooting and Optimization Strategies. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (63). Doi:10.3791/3998.
Lowe, T., Sharefkin, J., Yang, S. Q., & Dieffenbach, C. W. (1990). A computer program for selection of oligonucleotide primers for polymerase chain reactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 18(7), 1757-1761. Doi:10.1093/nar/18.7.1757.
Lundberg, K. S., Shoemaker, D. D., Adams, M. W., Short, J. M., Sorge, J. A., & Mathur, E. J. (1991). High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus. Gene, 108(1), 1-6. Doi:10.1016/0378-1119(91)90480-y.
Malmström, Bo G. (1997). “Kary B. Mullis Nobel Lecture.” Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1991-1995, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore. Nobel Media AB 2018, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/facts/.
Marcus, S. L., & Modak, M. J. (1976). Observations on template-specific conditions for DNA synthesis by avian myeloblastosis virus DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Research, 3(6), 1473-1486. Doi:10.1093/nar/3.6.1473.
Mullis, K. B., & Faloona, F. A. (1989). Specific Synthesis of DNA in Vitro via a Polymerase-Catalyzed Chain Reaction. Recombinant DNA Methodology, 189-204. Doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-765560-4.50015-0.
Paul, N., Shum, J., & Le, T. (2010). Hot Start PCR. Methods in Molecular Biology RT-PCR Protocols, 630:301-318. Doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-629-0_19.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved December 11, 2018, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techpcr/.
Rio, D. C. (2014). Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2014(11). Doi:10.1101/pdb.prot080887.
Rychlik, W., Spencer, W., & Rhoads, R. (1991). Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplificationin vitro. Nucleic Acids Research, 19(3), 698-698. Doi:10.1093/nar/19.3.698-a.
Sabzghabaee, A., Moazen, F., Mousavian, Z., & Sadeghi, H. M. (2014). Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a GC rich region by adding 1,2 propanediol. Advanced Biomedical Research, 3(1), 65. Doi:10.4103/2277-9175.125846.
Saiki, R., Gelfand, D., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S., Higuchi, R., Horn, G., . . . Erlich, H. (1988). Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science, 239(4839), 487-491. Doi:10.1126/science.2448875.
Steitz, T. A. (1998). A mechanism for all polymerases. Nature, 391(6664), 231-232. Doi:10.1038/34542.
Terpe, K. (2013). Overview of thermostable DNA polymerases for classical PCR applications: From molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(24), 10243-10254. Doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5290-2.
Uemori, T., Sato, Y., Kato, I., Doi, H., & Ishino, Y. (1997). A novel DNA polymerase in the hyperthermophilic archaeon,Pyrococcus furiosus: Gene cloning, expression, and characterization. Genes to Cells, 2(8), 499-512. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1380336.x.
Vamvakopoulos, N. C., Vournakis, J. N., & Marcus, S. L. (1977). The effect of magnesium and manganese ions on the structure and template activity for reverse transcriptase of polyribocytidylate and its 2-o-methyl derivative. Nucleic Acids Research, 4(10), 3589-3597. Doi:10.1093/nar/4.10.3589.
Vashishtha, A. K., Wang, J., & Konigsberg, W. H. (2016). Different Divalent Cations Alter the Kinetics and Fidelity of DNA Polymerases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 291(40), 20869-20875. Doi:10.1074/jbc.r116.742494.
Wacker, M. J., and Godard M. P. (2005). Analysis of One-Step and Two-Step Real-Time RT-PCR Using SuperScript III. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques 16(3): 266–271.
Wong, M. L., & Medrano, J. F. (2005). Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. BioTechniques, 39(1), 75-85. Doi:10.2144/05391rv01.
Yasukawa, K., Nemoto, D., & Inouye, K. (2008). Comparison of the Thermal Stabilities of Reverse Transcriptases from Avian Myeloblastosis Virus and Moloney Murine Leukaemia Virus. Journal of Biochemistry, 143(2), 261-268. Doi:10.1093/jb/mvm217.